Slightly improve the coverage of the validator test

This commit is contained in:
Yann Hamon 2024-05-09 16:35:14 +02:00
parent 20805f652c
commit f5168b644d

View file

@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ func TestValidate(t *testing.T) {
schemaRegistry2 []byte schemaRegistry2 []byte
ignoreMissingSchema bool ignoreMissingSchema bool
strict bool strict bool
expect Status expectStatus Status
expectErrors []ValidationError
}{ }{
{ {
"valid resource", "valid resource",
@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Valid, Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"invalid resource", "invalid resource",
@ -101,6 +103,12 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Invalid, Invalid,
[]ValidationError{
{
Path: "/firstName",
Msg: "expected number, but got string",
},
},
}, },
{ {
"missing required field", "missing required field",
@ -134,6 +142,12 @@ firstName: foo
false, false,
false, false,
Invalid, Invalid,
[]ValidationError{
{
Path: "",
Msg: "missing properties: 'lastName'",
},
},
}, },
{ {
"key \"firstName\" already set in map", "key \"firstName\" already set in map",
@ -160,6 +174,7 @@ firstName: bar
false, false,
true, true,
Error, Error,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"key firstname already set in map in non-strict mode", "key firstname already set in map in non-strict mode",
@ -186,6 +201,7 @@ firstName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Valid, Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"resource has invalid yaml", "resource has invalid yaml",
@ -223,6 +239,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Error, Error,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"missing schema in 1st registry", "missing schema in 1st registry",
@ -260,6 +277,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Valid, Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"non-json response in 1st registry", "non-json response in 1st registry",
@ -297,6 +315,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Valid, Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"missing schema in both registries, ignore missing", "missing schema in both registries, ignore missing",
@ -311,6 +330,7 @@ lastName: bar
true, true,
false, false,
Skipped, Skipped,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"missing schema in both registries, do not ignore missing", "missing schema in both registries, do not ignore missing",
@ -325,6 +345,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Error, Error,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"non-json response in both registries, ignore missing", "non-json response in both registries, ignore missing",
@ -339,6 +360,7 @@ lastName: bar
true, true,
false, false,
Skipped, Skipped,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"non-json response in both registries, do not ignore missing", "non-json response in both registries, do not ignore missing",
@ -353,6 +375,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Error, Error,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
} { } {
val := v{ val := v{
@ -373,11 +396,21 @@ lastName: bar
}), }),
}, },
} }
if got := val.ValidateResource(resource.Resource{Bytes: testCase.rawResource}); got.Status != testCase.expect { got := val.ValidateResource(resource.Resource{Bytes: testCase.rawResource})
if got.Status != testCase.expectStatus {
if got.Err != nil { if got.Err != nil {
t.Errorf("Test '%s' - expected %d, got %d: %s", testCase.name, testCase.expect, got.Status, got.Err.Error()) t.Errorf("Test '%s' - expected %d, got %d: %s", testCase.name, testCase.expectStatus, got.Status, got.Err.Error())
} else { } else {
t.Errorf("%d - expected %d, got %d", i, testCase.expect, got.Status) t.Errorf("Test '%s'- %d - expected %d, got %d", testCase.name, i, testCase.expectStatus, got.Status)
}
}
if len(got.ValidationErrors) != len(testCase.expectErrors) {
t.Errorf("Test '%s': expected ValidationErrors: %+v, got: % v", testCase.name, testCase.expectErrors, got.ValidationErrors)
}
for i, _ := range testCase.expectErrors {
if testCase.expectErrors[i] != got.ValidationErrors[i] {
t.Errorf("Test '%s': expected ValidationErrors: %+v, got: % v", testCase.name, testCase.expectErrors, got.ValidationErrors)
} }
} }
} }