Slightly improve the coverage of the validator test (#271)

This commit is contained in:
Yann Hamon 2024-05-09 16:37:20 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 20805f652c
commit 7062384492
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ func TestValidate(t *testing.T) {
schemaRegistry2 []byte
ignoreMissingSchema bool
strict bool
expect Status
expectStatus Status
expectErrors []ValidationError
}{
{
"valid resource",
@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ lastName: bar
false,
false,
Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
},
{
"invalid resource",
@ -101,6 +103,12 @@ lastName: bar
false,
false,
Invalid,
[]ValidationError{
{
Path: "/firstName",
Msg: "expected number, but got string",
},
},
},
{
"missing required field",
@ -134,6 +142,12 @@ firstName: foo
false,
false,
Invalid,
[]ValidationError{
{
Path: "",
Msg: "missing properties: 'lastName'",
},
},
},
{
"key \"firstName\" already set in map",
@ -160,6 +174,7 @@ firstName: bar
false,
true,
Error,
[]ValidationError{},
},
{
"key firstname already set in map in non-strict mode",
@ -186,6 +201,7 @@ firstName: bar
false,
false,
Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
},
{
"resource has invalid yaml",
@ -223,6 +239,7 @@ lastName: bar
false,
false,
Error,
[]ValidationError{},
},
{
"missing schema in 1st registry",
@ -260,6 +277,7 @@ lastName: bar
false,
false,
Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
},
{
"non-json response in 1st registry",
@ -297,6 +315,7 @@ lastName: bar
false,
false,
Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
},
{
"missing schema in both registries, ignore missing",
@ -311,6 +330,7 @@ lastName: bar
true,
false,
Skipped,
[]ValidationError{},
},
{
"missing schema in both registries, do not ignore missing",
@ -325,6 +345,7 @@ lastName: bar
false,
false,
Error,
[]ValidationError{},
},
{
"non-json response in both registries, ignore missing",
@ -339,6 +360,7 @@ lastName: bar
true,
false,
Skipped,
[]ValidationError{},
},
{
"non-json response in both registries, do not ignore missing",
@ -353,6 +375,7 @@ lastName: bar
false,
false,
Error,
[]ValidationError{},
},
} {
val := v{
@ -373,11 +396,21 @@ lastName: bar
}),
},
}
if got := val.ValidateResource(resource.Resource{Bytes: testCase.rawResource}); got.Status != testCase.expect {
got := val.ValidateResource(resource.Resource{Bytes: testCase.rawResource})
if got.Status != testCase.expectStatus {
if got.Err != nil {
t.Errorf("Test '%s' - expected %d, got %d: %s", testCase.name, testCase.expect, got.Status, got.Err.Error())
t.Errorf("Test '%s' - expected %d, got %d: %s", testCase.name, testCase.expectStatus, got.Status, got.Err.Error())
} else {
t.Errorf("%d - expected %d, got %d", i, testCase.expect, got.Status)
t.Errorf("Test '%s'- %d - expected %d, got %d", testCase.name, i, testCase.expectStatus, got.Status)
}
}
if len(got.ValidationErrors) != len(testCase.expectErrors) {
t.Errorf("Test '%s': expected ValidationErrors: %+v, got: % v", testCase.name, testCase.expectErrors, got.ValidationErrors)
}
for i, _ := range testCase.expectErrors {
if testCase.expectErrors[i] != got.ValidationErrors[i] {
t.Errorf("Test '%s': expected ValidationErrors: %+v, got: % v", testCase.name, testCase.expectErrors, got.ValidationErrors)
}
}
}