Slightly improve the coverage of the validator test

This commit is contained in:
Yann Hamon 2024-05-09 16:28:55 +02:00
parent 9627dd185b
commit 466f4d8b53

View file

@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
package validator package validator
import ( import (
"reflect"
"testing" "testing"
"github.com/yannh/kubeconform/pkg/registry" "github.com/yannh/kubeconform/pkg/registry"
@ -30,7 +29,8 @@ func TestValidate(t *testing.T) {
schemaRegistry2 []byte schemaRegistry2 []byte
ignoreMissingSchema bool ignoreMissingSchema bool
strict bool strict bool
expect Status expectStatus Status
expectErrors []ValidationError
}{ }{
{ {
"valid resource", "valid resource",
@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Valid, Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"invalid resource", "invalid resource",
@ -99,6 +100,12 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Invalid, Invalid,
[]ValidationError{
{
Path: "/firstName",
Msg: "expected number, but got string",
},
},
}, },
{ {
"missing required field", "missing required field",
@ -132,6 +139,12 @@ firstName: foo
false, false,
false, false,
Invalid, Invalid,
[]ValidationError{
{
Path: "",
Msg: "missing properties: 'lastName'",
},
},
}, },
{ {
"key \"firstName\" already set in map", "key \"firstName\" already set in map",
@ -158,6 +171,7 @@ firstName: bar
false, false,
true, true,
Error, Error,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"key firstname already set in map in non-strict mode", "key firstname already set in map in non-strict mode",
@ -184,6 +198,7 @@ firstName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Valid, Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"resource has invalid yaml", "resource has invalid yaml",
@ -221,6 +236,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Error, Error,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"missing schema in 1st registry", "missing schema in 1st registry",
@ -258,6 +274,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Valid, Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"non-json response in 1st registry", "non-json response in 1st registry",
@ -295,6 +312,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Valid, Valid,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"missing schema in both registries, ignore missing", "missing schema in both registries, ignore missing",
@ -309,6 +327,7 @@ lastName: bar
true, true,
false, false,
Skipped, Skipped,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"missing schema in both registries, do not ignore missing", "missing schema in both registries, do not ignore missing",
@ -323,6 +342,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Error, Error,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"non-json response in both registries, ignore missing", "non-json response in both registries, ignore missing",
@ -337,6 +357,7 @@ lastName: bar
true, true,
false, false,
Skipped, Skipped,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
{ {
"non-json response in both registries, do not ignore missing", "non-json response in both registries, do not ignore missing",
@ -351,6 +372,7 @@ lastName: bar
false, false,
false, false,
Error, Error,
[]ValidationError{},
}, },
} { } {
val := v{ val := v{
@ -371,67 +393,22 @@ lastName: bar
}), }),
}, },
} }
if got := val.ValidateResource(resource.Resource{Bytes: testCase.rawResource}); got.Status != testCase.expect { got := val.ValidateResource(resource.Resource{Bytes: testCase.rawResource})
if got.Status != testCase.expectStatus {
if got.Err != nil { if got.Err != nil {
t.Errorf("Test '%s' - expected %d, got %d: %s", testCase.name, testCase.expect, got.Status, got.Err.Error()) t.Errorf("Test '%s' - expected %d, got %d: %s", testCase.name, testCase.expectStatus, got.Status, got.Err.Error())
} else { } else {
t.Errorf("%d - expected %d, got %d", i, testCase.expect, got.Status) t.Errorf("Test '%s' - %d - expected %d, got %d", testCase.name, i, testCase.expectStatus, got.Status)
}
}
if len(got.ValidationErrors) != len(testCase.expectErrors) {
t.Errorf("Test '%s': expected ValidationErrors: %+v, got: % v", testCase.name, testCase.expectErrors, got.ValidationErrors)
}
for i, _ := range testCase.expectErrors {
if testCase.expectErrors[i] != got.ValidationErrors[i] {
t.Errorf("Test '%s': expected ValidationErrors: %+v, got: % v", testCase.name, testCase.expectErrors, got.ValidationErrors)
} }
} }
} }
} }
func TestValidationErrors(t *testing.T) {
rawResource := []byte(`
kind: name
apiVersion: v1
firstName: foo
age: not a number
`)
schema := []byte(`{
"title": "Example Schema",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"kind": {
"type": "string"
},
"firstName": {
"type": "string"
},
"lastName": {
"type": "string"
},
"age": {
"description": "Age in years",
"type": "integer",
"minimum": 0
}
},
"required": ["firstName", "lastName"]
}`)
expectedErrors := []ValidationError{
{Path: "", Msg: "missing properties: 'lastName'"},
{Path: "/age", Msg: "expected integer, but got string"},
}
val := v{
opts: Opts{
SkipKinds: map[string]struct{}{},
RejectKinds: map[string]struct{}{},
},
schemaCache: nil,
schemaDownload: downloadSchema,
regs: []registry.Registry{
newMockRegistry(func() (string, []byte, error) {
return "", schema, nil
}),
},
}
got := val.ValidateResource(resource.Resource{Bytes: rawResource})
if !reflect.DeepEqual(expectedErrors, got.ValidationErrors) {
t.Errorf("Expected %+v, got %+v", expectedErrors, got.ValidationErrors)
}
}